I’m delighted to announce that Reminders to Self is available now! Thanks very much for your support and encouragement.
I hope these help you even more than they have helped me, and that you start capturing your own personal Reminders to Self.
I’m delighted to announce that Reminders to Self is available now! Thanks very much for your support and encouragement.
I hope these help you even more than they have helped me, and that you start capturing your own personal Reminders to Self.
A reader asked for my views on quantum computing. My response:
Aside from cryptography, I don’t see quantum computing as a strategic game-changer. It could help in sophisticated modeling. It won’t speed up the algorithms we’ve already developed. We have a successful pipeline of compute capabilities for 99% of our digital needs. We’re good at optimizing for increased efficiency.
Should we continue to explore and develop quantum computing? Yes, because of cryptography, which is crucial in geopolitical security and war. Yes, because it could help us create more powerful predictive models of complex events like hurricanes and epidemics.
And then she asked me about virtual reality. My response:
There is some VR success in gaming, but I suspect we’re years from mass acceptance and ubiquitous use. It’s a difficult technology to implement for large populations because of the wide range of human perception capabilities and strengths. Meta’s VR group reported $16B in operating losses in one year trying to develop immersive VR and has begun cutting staff.
I expect people will continue to develop VR. The dream future is compelling to too many people to quit now.
My question: Given all we’re learning about the limitations of interaction-via-digital-screens (and health dangers), will there be a push for IRL (in real life) as more desirable?
Another reader asked for my view on digital currencies (not crypto, but sovereign-backed currencies).
They’re inevitable. Some definite upsides for efficiency and versatility, and some downsides if you have a corrupt government. Think Singapore vs. Venezuela. A government will need to produce significant evidence of controls to persuade more to use it, given widespread institutional distrust today. Adoption will be a small step for many citizens who are transacting with cards far more than cash.
Groups are more than the sum of the individuals. Ecological systems are more than the sum of all the organisms, water, soil, and atmosphere. We cannot explain cellular biology with chemistry. Chemistry cannot be fully explained with quantum physics. The properties of rocks and metal alloys cannot be fully explained at their atomic structural level. There are mysteries about subatomic particles which are unlikely to be explained fully by their sub-components.
We live in a universe of systems upon systems upon systems. The connections are real. You can dive deep and find cause and effect relationships. Yet the effort to break the complex and complicated down into ever smaller component parts never yields full understanding. You need information outside the system to understand the system (See Godel’s Incompleteness Theorems).
A significant fraction of disease research, especially cancer, is directed at finding the gene, the receptor protein, the drug, the parts of the machine. The fundamental belief is that the body is purely a machine. After decades of effort and trillions of dollars, with little to show beyond early detection, I suggest we consider whether we’re looking in the right place and should find another perspective.
I see the same tendency to “diagnose and treat” the weaknesses and failings of human organizations, from family to small and large businesses to governments and citizens. Consultants and program managers and therapists say, “Let’s break this down into parts we can work with.” The few successes are disproportionately small considering the immense efforts involved.
Here is a fundamental truth about systems: There is always something which can be done to shape the trajectory of a system.
Feel fee to call me crazy, but I’m convinced now the way to change a system is not through mechanics, but through story, music, and poetry.
Employees value recognition. Most employees when surveyed say they don’t get enough recognition. In this article I’ll give you insights about the recognition problem and some straightforward ways you can build more recognition into the culture of your organization.
Lack of recognition is invisibility. People who feel invisible, not recognized, say these kinds of things:
It’s possible to appreciate the wrong things. That’s a real concern. But you’re not likely to do too much recognition. The English word ‘recognize’ come from Latin, re “again” + congnoscere “to get to know.” Recognition is about knowing and making known. One of the features of high-performing teams is abundant feedback and recognition.
To avoid creating cynicism (deadly to a high-performing culture), your recognition must be sincere. We get the English word sincere from Latin, too. It means “without wax.” There’s a fun story behind this word. As the Roman middle class developed there was a growing demand for marble sculptures. Unscrupulous teams of sculptures would show up in an area and rapidly create sculptures at a price, then leave town. Their shoddy work was revealed after a few weeks of hot Tuscan sun, because the wax mixed with marble dust melted out of the cracks and defects in the sculptures. Reputable marble sculpture shops would put a sign out saying ‘San cera,’ meaning ‘without wax.’
Your recognition must be without wax, able to stand up in the heat of experience.
The leadership art of recognition has three key objectives:
Too many leaders think recognition needs to be big to be effective. An ocean is many drops of water. Many small moments of recognition become a wave of energizing power in an organization. Be patient, be consistent, and the effects will compound over time!
Let’s review five practices – all practical! – which will help your organization grow and thrive, even in difficult times.
Practice #1: Positive feedback
Give positive feedback on effective work, or progress. It can be quick and simple.
Easy model: “When you do <observable behavior> it helps our organization <in this way> . Thank you and keep it up!” (HT to the wonderful folks at manager-tools.com for this model)
Practice #2: Words of appreciation lubricate relationships
Saying please, thank you, and you’re welcome honors the value of people. It’s not just polite. Yes, doing things is “their job” but you should still be sincerely appreciative. If you cynical about this, then at least understand expressing appreciation is a tool to get more volunteer spirit.
I’m known for asking, “Have I said thank you lately?” It’s a powerful way to express appreciation, and people will feel recognized.
Next level: Written thank you notes stand out in a digital world. I know several successful leaders who keep a stash of notecards for this purpose.
Practice #3: Call attention to behaviors which build up the team
No one is an island; we’re working as a team. Leaders should look for opportunities to call attention to behaviors which build up the team. You’ll get more of these behaviors when you recognize them:
All these act as deposits in the “trust accounts,” which fuels a high-performing culture. You will get more of what gets publicly and privately recognized.
Practice #4: Email notifications to the boss
Send a specific and descriptive email to your boss about the accomplishments of a team member. Don’t just forward a long conversation thread with a comment like “Bob is doing great work” and expect them to figure out what Bob has done. Write a separate email, with an easy to scan format, saying what was done and the value it brings. People like to get an email that’s not about a problem they have to solve!
Bonus tip: Ask your team member to write an email you can forward; add a few comments of your own about the value delivered.
Doing this consistently will pay off in the future when you’re making the case for promotions and raises.
Practice # 5: Arrange for more time with leaders and customers
Giving your team time with other leaders, and especially customers who benefit from your team’s work, is a good way to recognize them. You’re also giving these people an opportunity to say thank you and generate some goodwill, which they’ll appreciate.
Invite a senior leader to talk with your team for 15-30 minutes. Invite a customer to share at your group meeting. Invite an interesting leader to come for a coffee break informal discussion. These don’t need to be big, formal occasions to be effective. I’ve rarely been turned down when making these invitations, though sometimes you’ll have to reschedule because of other priorities for senior leaders.
There you go, five straightforward practices you can use to build up your organization through recognition. Let us know in the comments if you have other suggestions!
Gentlefolk, I’m taking August off. I expect to begin publishing posts again September 2nd.
Grace and peace!
Note: I originally wrote this about 2012 — still stand by it!
Not long ago I left the office, fuming with frustration, and headed home. I could feel the blood pounding in my ears. I got a glass of ice water and sat down with my journal, took a deep breath, took another one, and then wrote this out. I’m sharing because I hope this helps some others, too.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I want to acknowledge how ungrateful I am. I leave my office most days tired, frustrated, unsatisfied. I selfishly want so much more, most of the time, that I fail to remember how good I have it.
I am extraordinarily blessed with wife, children, and extended family. I have handfuls of deep friendships.
Spiritually I am filthy rich in Christ Jesus, a citizen of heaven by grace, and able to rely upon the strength of the gospel day by day. I have nothing to fear because “the God of angel armies is by my side.”
I live a comfortable, affluent life. Kings of old could not imagine the conveniences we take for granted. I use more technology daily than sci-fi writers in 1950 wrote about. I’m in a generation that is living longer and healthier at older ages than any previous generation. I live in one of the freest safest countries on earth.
Our travel options are so grand I could get to almost anywhere on the planet within 3 days of starting out. People the world over speak (or want to speak) my native language.
Intellectually I get to live in an idea-rich world, practically unlimited access to data, and I’ve benefited from 21 years of formal schooling and post-doctoral studies. I have the tools to capture and share my writing with others. I have meaningful work with smart, savvy, hard-working colleagues. We’re contributing to our company’s efforts to tackle a handful of the most important problems in the world, including feeding a growing world population.
I have abundant opportunities to serve others.
I have no reasons for complaints, none. I should have only room and energy for gratitude. Perhaps the most significant battle I get to fight (not need to, but get to) is the fight for joy and gratitude.
There is “just in time” learning and “just in case” learning.
You can rely upon just in time learning for specific skills. Internet search works well, and there are good books on specific skills in your business or for common situations. Frankly speaking, if you’re a senior leader, you can delegate much of that type of work.
Just in case learning can be a trap. You don’t need to know everything in advance. I advise people going out alone in the woods to know good information, and practice certain skills, in case of emergency. But you don’t need a medical certification. One of my neighbors growing up in West Virginia would say, “Ya canna learn nothing useless.” Pursuing what interests and intrigues you is always worthwhile as a human being. Lifelong curiosity should be cultivated. But there is limited time.
The key question for leaders: How to learn what will be helpful in new situations where there aren’t straightforward answers? This is where studying biographies, history, moral and religious teaching, art, and great literature come in. Studying these fields builds up a treasure trove of insights that will help you analyze and navigate forward.
The global financial situation means that for the next few years:
Inflation will continue to be a challenge
Prices generally will remain high (a few exceptions)
Wages are generally going to increase (a few exceptions)
That means increased requirements for employee productivity to justify labor costs as part of organizational budgets. What was good enough 2 years ago is not good enough in the next 12 months, and expectations will ratchet up.
Practical management opportunities:
Reminder to self, you’re welcome to listen: Productivity is not measured by value of deliverables, not by busyness.
I wrote recently about the building blocks of what lasts. Institutions last, sometimes many generations. Trust in institutions has eroded in cities and countries all over the world. People can’t thrive in a world without reliable institutions, no matter what the modern anarchists say. Therefore you and I should care deeply about and for institutions.
It’s helpful to distinguish institutions from organizations and movements.
Organizations exist in many forms, from extended families to massive corporations. People come together and work together in a formal structure. Organizations can replicate processes and improve processes. They can evolve and adapt to change, sometimes reinventing themselves. Organizations have a spotty record of developing future generations of workers; some create their own leadership pipelines but most count on hiring new generations of workers and leaders.
It’s crucial to understand that corporations are legal entities without a soul. They were invented. A corporation can act like a person does (e.g., own property, create binding contracts) but does not have the same accountability as an individual. A corporation’s power is its lack of soul, despite transparent efforts to infuse soul-like qualities into corporations to induce employee ‘engagement’ and social attractiveness. Corporations have no moral limits apart from legal and regulatory constraints, which were created by people with moral frameworks.
Movements are people coming together with common ideas and energy, usually with less structure than an organization. They can be tremendously powerful and influential. (Violence is the characteristic of a movement that becomes a mob.) I’m sure you can think of multiple movements in recent years. There will be more. Movements are a natural feature of human populations.
It’s difficult to engineer or control a movement; the energy is more channeled than designed. Movements are like being carried along by a wave in the ocean. We’re not sure where the wave began, now it’s moving us, and then suddenly the wave is gone. Movements tend to dissipate faster than they began. Movements cannot reproduce themselves; movements can inspire counter-movements. No movement lasts for multiple generations. Participate in movements that resonate with you, yet be sober about their time-span.
An institution is an organization which has developed self-reproducing capabilities while retaining a consistent purpose. We live among and participate in many institutions: sports groups, religious communities, schools, a subset of social clubs like the Rotary, military, government. Institutions are generally oriented toward maintaining order and stability within a society, providing frameworks for social behavior, and supporting societal functions. Marriage is a special-case institution.
Institutions can have long, multigenerational histories. Their reproduction is not pure replication or cloning. Just as a child has common DNA with her parents and is unique, the subsequent generations of people in an institution have both common ancestry and uniqueness. Commonness is from codes and creeds. I remember when my Scoutmaster first quizzed me on the Boy Scout oath he said, “Millions of boys spoke these words and became men.” That stuck with me.
Institutions, like all human organizations, tend to ossify. Therefore, there must be mechanisms for evolution and adaptation without sacrificing purpose and principles. We can’t be like those who say, “If the King James English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it’s good enough for me!” (Forgive me, but I’m only partially hyperbolic in writing that.) What Kent Wagner said about marriages is true for all institutions: “There are only two kinds of marriages, those being worked on and those which aren’t.”
Institutions, like all human organizations, can engender trust or destroy it by their behaviors. Trust is always gained in many small drops and lost in a flood. There was a story told where I grew up about a boy who lied often. His father set up a post by the road where passersby could see it. He pounded a nail into the post every time he caught his son in a lie. When the boy did some manly action he pulled a nail from the post – but the passerby could still see the hole.
I’m particularly intrigued about what’s needed for honorable and sustainable reproduction within an institution. What does it take for one generation to develop the next, and so on, many times? How does this process continue in the face of collapsed trust? How do we foster reproduction of people who can in turn reproduce others? (In biblical language, how do we make disciples who can make disciples who make disciples?) How can institutions do this amidst even cascading crises?
Successful institutions know their mission and have clear ideas of what they are NOT. They have internalizable codes and creeds. They honor their ancestry and history. They keep promises about honoring their legacy.
Institutions require an investment mentality – sow now, reap later. There is a considerable gap between investment and payoff. I reflect on all the institutions which invested in me as a child and younger person. I probably wasn’t a net positive contributor until I was 40 years old!
Reproduction is about education, not indoctrination. Indoctrinated students are never permitted to deviate from or go beyond the approved ‘curriculum.’ Educated students are expected to honor what they’ve been taught as preparation for going beyond a finite set of knowledge. Pure indoctrination cannot evolve and adapt. It will only change when the institution breaks.
Institutions must have a well-seasoned playbook for teaching the fundamentals. It’s not just knowledge. Institutional reproduction is the apprenticeship model: There is instruction, practice with abundant feedback, and association with other practitioners of the craft. There are clear standards of mastery of the fundamentals.
What conditions favor a reproduction model? There must be incentives for the teacher/coach/leader to develop others. The US Army does this well. An officer is rated in large part by how well they have trained those in their command. It’s difficult for an officer to be promoted if he cannot point to two or three soldiers ready to take over. Institutions must normalize the expectation of developing the next generation. They must demand development; it’s part of the role responsibility, not an add-on. Likewise, the student/apprentice must have incentives to learn, to grow, to achieve new levels of mastery. There are recognized advancement points. There are rewards for demonstrated progress and new skills.
Curiously, an institution must have skin in the game to be successful. The ongoing purpose must be large and significant. There is something serious to lose when we fail. West Point cadets are taught that when a business fails, jobs and money are lost, but when they fail, people die and nations fall.
Maintaining a standard of excellence is the common way institutions forestall a passive slide into obsolescence. No coasting – true for a football coach, a pastor, a government official, a school teacher, or the Rotary Club president. Bustle and posturing are not the same as productive industry. The most successful institutions set high expectations and create environments where people want to exceed them. I’ve told many people about military recruiters coming to my high school in 1979. The Army, Navy, and Air Force recruiters pitched all the benefits. The Marine recruiter looked at each of us in the auditorium and said only “There might be two of you good enough to be United States Marines.” You can guess which recruiter was most successful that day.
Subtract any of these things – mission clarity, trust, education/apprenticeship with incentives for all, skin in the game, excellence – and institutions flail and fail. Institution from healthy families to government agencies need deep people and breed deep people. I hope you’ll consider how you can help institutions succeed in the future.
I notice that when I pray for peace, I will be given more opportunities to be a peace-maker. When I pray for blessing of healing for my mother’s physical ailments, I have more opportunities to be a comforter to her. When I pray for courage to speak wisely into a difficult conversation, I’m handed additional opportunities to be courageous. (I see remarkably things I cannot explain apart from a divine act, but they always come with opportunities.)
A significant part of growing as a person is the willingness to step into opportunities for leadership, rather than turning aside. Don’t go to the brink of experience and shuffle away.